SB 1055
Establishes the Designated Health Care Decision-Maker Act, which authorizes certain persons to make health care decisions for certain incapacitated persons
Sponsor:
LR Number:
4464S.01I
Committee:
Last Action:
1/25/2024 - Second Read and Referred S Health and Welfare Committee
Journal Page:
Title:
Effective Date:
August 28, 2024

Current Bill Summary

SB 1055 - This act establishes the Designated Health Care Decision-Maker Act. The act provides that a health care provider or health care facility may rely on the exercise of good faith and in accordance with reasonable medical judgment upon the health care decisions made for a patient by a designated health care decision-maker, provided that two licensed physicians determine that such patient is incapacitated and has neither a guardian with medical decision-making authority, an attorney in fact appointed in a durable power of attorney for health care, is not a child under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, nor any other known person who has the legal authority to make health care decisions. Additionally, the physician or another health care provider shall make reasonable efforts, as described in the act, to inform potential designated health care decision-makers of a patient's incapacitation.

Designated health care decision-makers may be selected from the following persons listed by priority:

(1) The spouse of the patient;

(2) An adult child of the patient;

(3) A parent of the patient;

(4) An adult sibling of the patient;

(5) A grandparent or adult grandchild;

(6) The niece or nephew or the next nearest relative;

(7) A religious person who is a member of the patient's community;

(8) Any nonrelative with a close personal relationship who is familiar with the patient's values; or

(9) A person unanimously agree upon by those in the priority list.

Priority shall not be given to those listed if abuse or neglect is reported, the person with priority cannot be reached by the physician, or if the probate court finds that the person with priority is making decisions contrary to the patient's instructions. Furthermore, this act does not prevent any person interested in the patient's welfare, a health care provider, or a health care facility from petitioning the probate court for the appointment of a guardian.

Additionally, this act provides that a designated health care decision-maker shall make reasonable efforts to obtain information regarding the patient's health preferences and make decisions in the patient's best interests. Additionally, a designated health care decision-maker may only authorize the withdrawal or withholding of nutrition or hydration supplied through either natural or artificial means in certain situations as specified in the act.

Once a health care decision-maker or physician believes that the patient is no longer incapacitated then the patient shall be reexamined. If the patient's physician determines that the patient is no longer incapacitated, then the physician shall certify the decision and the basis therefor in the patient's medical record and shall notify the patient, the designated health care decision-maker, and the person who initiated the redetermination of capacity. Rights of the designated health care decision-maker shall cease upon the physician's certification that the patient is no longer incapacitated.

This act further provides that no health care provider or health care facility that makes reasonable efforts to locate and communicate with potential designated health care decision-makers shall be held liable for the effort to identify and communicate with a potential designated health care decision-maker.

Additionally, a health care provider or health care facility may decline to comply with the decision of a health care decision-maker if the decision is contrary to the religious beliefs or moral convictions of the provider or facility. If a health care provider declines to comply with a health care decision of the designated health care decision-maker, no health care provider or health care facility shall impede the transfer of the patient to another provider or facility willing to comply with the health care decision.

Nothing in this act shall be construed as condoning, authorizing, or approving euthanasia or mercy killing, or as permitting any affirmative or deliberate act to end a person's life.

This act is substantially similar to HCS/HB 2502 (2016) and is similar to HCS/HB 144 (2017), the perfected HCS/HB 381 (2017), SB 493 (2017), and SB 493 (2016).

KATIE O'BRIEN

Amendments

No Amendments Found.