Fiscal Note - SB 0404 - Certain Supreme Court Rules Shall Not Supersede Statutes
L.R. NO. 1602-02
BILL NO. Perfected SCS for SB 404
SUBJECT: Supreme Court Rules
TYPE: Original
DATE: April 16, 1997
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000
None
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All
State Funds $0 $0 $0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000
None
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All
Federal Funds $0 $0 $0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000
Local Government $0 $0 $0
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator and Office of
Administration -- Administrative Hearing Commission assume the proposed
legislation would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.
In response to a similar proposal, officials from the Office of the Attorney
General assume the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on their
agency.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000
$0 $0 $0
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000
$0 $0 $0
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of
this proposal.
DESCRIPTION
The proposal would establish that any Supreme Court Administrative Rule which
conflicts with any law enacted by the General Assembly would be void and
unenforceable. Specifically, the proposal would establish that
Administrative Rules 6.05 and 14.01 of the Supreme Court are to be declared
null and void.
The proposal contains an emergency clause.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other
program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental
space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of State Courts Administrator
Office of the Attorney General
Office of Administration -- Administrative Hearing Commission
This Fiscal Note is not an official copy and should not be quoted or cited.