COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO. 2182-02
BILL NO. SB 586
SUBJECT: Crimes and Punishment; Medical Procedures and Personnel; Physicians
TYPE: Original
DATE: January 7, 1998
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS Net Effect on All State Funds
FUND AFFECTED
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001 None
Total Estimated
$0
$0
$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
None | |||
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
Local Government | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses
This fiscal note contains 3 pages.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator, the Department of Insurance, the Office of Administration, the Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan, the Department of Health, the Office of Prosecution Services, the Department of Conservation, the State Public Defender, the Department of Social Services, the Department of Public Safety - Missouri State Highway Patrol, and the Office of Attorney General assume this proposal would not fiscally impact their agencies.
Department of Correction (DOC) officials state they cannot predict the number of new commitments which may result from the creation of the offense(s) outlined in this proposal. DOC states that an increase in commitments depends on the utilization by prosecutors and the actual sentences imposed by the court. DOC further states that if additional persons are sentenced to the custody of DOC due to the provisions of this proposal, DOC would incur a corresponding increase in operational costs either through incarceration (average of $30.47 per inmate per day) or through supervision provided by the Board of Probation and Parole (average of $2.47 per offender per day. Supervision by DOC through probation or incarceration would result in some additional costs but it is assumed that the impact would be minimal.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
$0 | $0 | $0 | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
$0 | $0 | $0 | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
DESCRIPTION
This proposal would prohibit partial birth abortions except to save the life of the mother. The definition of the procedure would be one which involves all of the following elements: deliberate dilation of the cervix, usually over a sequence of days; instrumental conversion of the fetus to a footling breech; breech extraction of the body excepting the head; and partial DESCRIPTION (continued)
evacuation of the intracranial contents of a viable fetus to effect vaginal delivery of a dead, but otherwise intact fetus. A physician who would violate the prohibition would be guilty of a Class D felony.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Health
Department of Social Services
Office of State Courts Administrator
State Public Defender
Office of Prosecution Services
Office of Attorney General
Department of Insurance
Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan
Department of Corrections
Department of Conservation
Office of Administration
Department of Public Safety
Missouri State Highway Patrol
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
January 7, 1998