COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO. 2489-01
BILL NO. Perfected SB 566
SUBJECT: Public Service Commission: Utilities
TYPE: Original
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
None | |||
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All State Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
None | |||
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
Local Government | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses
This fiscal note contains 3 pages.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials of the Department of Economic Development, Public Service Commission and the Department of Natural Resources assume this proposal would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.
The Department of Economic Development, Office of Public Counsel did not respond to our fiscal impact request. However, in a similar proposal from a prior session, they indicated there would be no fiscal impact on their agency.
Oversight assumes if a municipality is found to be in violation, a penalty would result and there would be a fiscal impact to the extent of the penalty amount cited in the proposed legislation.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
0 | 0 | 0 | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
0 | 0 | 0 | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business | |||
This proposal could have a fiscal impact for those small natural gas utility companies to the extent that they would be subject to increased civil penalties for violations of certain Commission regulations. If a complaint is filed against a small utility business for violations of those regulations, they may be subject to increased penalty amounts for each violation ($10,000 instead of $2,000).
DESCRIPTION
This proposal would revise certain penalties for violations by regulated utilities. It would increase the state penalty for violations of the federal Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1986 to match the federal penalty whenever required by federal law. The maximum federal penalty for violations of such safety standards is a fine of up to $10,000 per violation, limited to $500,000 per related series of violations.
This legislation is federally mandated to the extent that certain sections of the Natural Gas
Pipeline Safety Act of 1986 as amended mandates that the maximum penalty for violations of federal pipeline safety rules is $25,000. However, the US Department of Transportation currently requires states participating in the Pipeline Safety Grant Aid Program to have a $10,000 minimum penalty for violations. This legislation would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Economic Development
Public Service Commission
Department of Natural Resources
NOT RESPONDING: Department of Economic Development, Office of Public Counsel
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
April 22, 1998