COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO. 2884-01
BILL NO. SJR 28
SUBJECT: Constitutional Amendment: Property Tax and Education
TYPE: Original
DATE: February 5, 1998
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS Net Effect on All State Funds
FUND AFFECTED
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001 General Revenue
($55,300)
$0
$0
Total Estimated
($55,300)
$0
$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
Local Government | $0 | $0 to Unknown | $0 to Unknown |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses
This fiscal note contains 3 pages.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials of the State Auditor and the State Tax Commission reported this proposal would not affect their agencies, administratively.
Oversight notes that school districts must have a levy of at least $2.75 to qualify for full funding under the foundation formula and assumes that raising the rate which may be imposed without a vote to $2.00 would not have a large fiscal impact. However, the proposal would have the effect of raising the maximum levy which could be imposed by simple majority vote (instead of a two-thirds majority vote) from $3.75 to $6.00. (According to Tax Commission records, the difference in proceeds from an $6.00 rate and the tax rate ceiling rates for school districts would have been $1.1 billion in 1995. This would be the maximum possible increase in revenue to school districts if the voters would have approved.)
Advertisement costs for the proposal would be $3,990 per newspaper column inch for three publications of the text of the proposal, the introduction, title, fiscal note summary, and affidavit. The proposal would be on the ballot for the November 1998 general election.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
Cost to General Revenue Fund | |||
Secretary of State | |||
Newspaper Advertisements | ($55,300) | $0 | $0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
Income to School Districts | |||
Increased Taxes | $0 | $0 | $0 |
to | to | ||
Unknown | Unknown | ||
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business | |||
Small businesses would be affected by any higher property tax rates enacted as a result of this proposal.
DESCRIPTION
This proposal would: 1) raise the maximum tax levy which school districts formed of cities and towns could assess without voter approval to $2.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation
DESCRIPTION (continued)
from $1.25 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation, and 2) allow the Kansas City school district (or any successor district or districts) to set an operating levy for school purposes at less than the court-ordered rate for the 1995 tax year and to change the levy from year-to-year so long as any rate greater than the court-ordered rate for the 1995 tax year would be approved by a majority of voters of the school district.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program, would not require additional capital improvements or rental space, and would not affect total state revenue.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
State Auditor
State Tax Commission
Secretary of State
NOT RESPONDING: Kansas City School Board; City of Kansas City
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
February 5, 1998