COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO. 3159-01
BILL NO. SB 703
SUBJECT: Criminal Procedure; Crimes and Punishment; Judges; Juries;
Corrections Department
TYPE: Original
DATE: January 28, 1998
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS Net Effect on All State Funds
FUND AFFECTED
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001 None
Total Estimated
$0
$0
$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
None | |||
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
Local Government | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses
This fiscal note contains 3 pages.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials of the Office of the Attorney General, State Courts Administrator, Office of Prosecution Services (OPS) and State Public Defender assume this proposal would have no fiscal impact to their agencies.
OPS officials assume this proposal would have minimal impact on local prosecutors.
Officials of the Department of Corrections (DOC) assume this proposal require life without parole in capital cases when the jury has deadlocked on punishment, as the option of the death sentence would no longer be an option.
DOC officials could not predict the number of offenders which could serve longer sentences due to passage of this proposal. An increase in time served depends on the actual sentences imposed by the court and the decisions of a jury. If offenders were to serve longer sentences, DOC would incur a corresponding increase in operational costs through incarceration (average of $30.37 per inmate, per day). Any fiscal impact would occur after the tenth year of incarceration which is the average time spent on death row awaiting execution.
DOC would anticipate that new beds might have to be constructed in the future to accommodate the number of offenders receiving longer sentences due to passage of this proposal. At this time, DOC officials were unable to determine the number of people that would be convicted under the provisions of this proposal to estimate the fiscal impact for additional capital improvements. Estimated construction cost for one new maximum security inmate bed is $48,800. Utilizing this per diem bed cost provides for a conservative estimate by the DOC, as entire facilities and/or housing units would have to be constructed to cover the cost of housing new commitments or housing offenders for longer prison stays resulting from the cumulative effect of various new legislation, if adopted as statute.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
0 | 0 | 0 | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
0 | 0 | 0 | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business | |||
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
DESCRIPTION
This proposal would prohibit a judge from sentencing a defendant to death if a jury was deadlocked on the issue of punishment, and would require the sentence to be life without parole.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of the Attorney General
State Courts Administrator
Office of Prosecution Services
State Public Defender
Department of Corrections
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
January 28, 1998