COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO. 3172-01
BILL NO. SB 715
SUBJECT: Agriculture and Animals; Revenue Dept.; Taxation and Revenue-Sales and Use
TYPE: Original
DATE: February 9, 1998
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS Net Effect on All State Funds
FUND AFFECTED
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001 General Revenue
(unknown)
(unknown)
(unknown) School District Trust
(unknown)
(unknown)
(unknown) Conservation
(unknown)
(unknown)
(unknown) Parks and Soil
(unknown)
(unknown)
(unknown) Total Estimated
(expected to exceed
$500,000)
(expected to exceed
$500,000)
(expected to exceed
$500,000)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
None | |||
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses
This fiscal note contains 3 pages.
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
Local Government | (unknown) | (unknown) | (unknown) |
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials of the Department of Agriculture and the Missouri Department of Transportation state this proposal would not fiscally impact their agencies.
Officials of the Department of Revenue (DOR) state this proposal would expand the current sales and use tax exemption for pesticides to include adjuvants such as crop oils, surfactants, wetting agents and "other assorted pesticide carriers" used to improve or enhance the effect of pesticides and foam markers used in pesticide application. DOR staff state that this proposal would have a minimal administrative impact on their agency. The revenue impact is unknown.
Oversight assumes this proposal would have a negative unknown impact to the General Revenue Fund, School District Trust Fund, Conservation Fund and Parks & Soil Fund as well as local governments since sales tax revenues would decrease. While data is not available to accurately estimate total affected sales, the 1997 Tax Expenditures Report shows for 1995 expenditures for agricultural pesticides/poisons were $4.8 million. Assuming that adjuvants would makeup 10% of additional expenditures, Oversight assumes that the revenue loss as a result of this proposal would exceed $500,000 annually.
This proposal would result in a decrease in Total State Revenues.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
Loss to General Revenue Fund | |||
Adjuvants Sales Tax Exemption | (unknown) | (unknown) | (unknown) |
Loss to School District Trust Fund | |||
Adjuvants Sales Tax Exemption | (unknown) | (unknown) | (unknown) |
Loss to Conservation Fund | |||
Adjuvants Sales Tax Exemption | (unknown) | (unknown) | (unknown) |
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
(Continued) | (10 Mo.) | ||
Loss to Parks & Soils Fund | |||
Adjuvants Sales Tax Exemption | (unknown) | (unknown) | (unknown) |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
Loss to Cities and Counties | (unknown) | (unknown) | (unknown) |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business | |||
Small businesses would be expected to be fiscally impacted to the extent that they purchase adjuvants for pesticides application. Small businesses could purchase the adjuvants exempt from sales/use tax.
DESCRIPTION
This act clarifies the current exemption from sales and use tax of pesticides to include adjuvants such as crop oils, surfactants, wetting agents, and other pesticide carriers which improve or enhance the effect of a pesticide.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Revenue
Department of Agriculture
Missouri Department of Transportation
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
February 9, 1998