COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO. 3252-01
BILL NO. SB 682
SUBJECT: Unemployment Compensation
TYPE: Original
DATE: January 22, 1998
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS Net Effect on All State Funds * * This is not a State Fund. Monies are administered by the DOL. ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS Net Effect on All Federal Funds * Subject to compliance issues with the USDOL. ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses This fiscal note contains 3 pages. FISCAL ANALYSIS ASSUMPTION The Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (DOL) assume this proposal could cause substantial
economic loss to contributing employers and a conformity issue with the Federal Unemployment Tax Act
(FUTA). If Missouri's Employment Security Law is out of conformity with Federal law, there could be a
loss of certification for FUTA and a loss in federal unemployment tax credits for all contributing
employers. The estimated amount of lost FUTA credits to Missouri employers could be more than $700
million annually. Oversight assumes passage of this proposal could result in the loss of $0 or $40 million
in federal funds for the administration of the DOL, depending on the determination of noncompliance with
federal law. According to the position taken by the United States Department of Labor, as a condition of employers
in the State (Missouri) receiving credit against the Federal unemployment tax, an employer in
reimbursement status must reimburse 100 percent of all benefit costs attributable to service with that
employer. Section 3309 (a) (1), FUTA, does not contain any exception to this requirement, it does not
permit any factors concerning the entity's current or prior status to be taken into account in adjusting the
reimbursement due. Therefore, under this proposal, "any employer, governmental entity or nonprofit organization" must
reimburse the full amounts of benefits attributable to services performed in its employ during the period
for which the reimbursement option has been elected. If this proposal is enacted and given effect in any
circumstances, questions of conformity and compliance would be presented under Section 3304 (a) (6)
(B), FUTA.
FUND AFFECTED
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001 Unemployment
Compensation Trust
Fund **
(Unknown)
(Unknown)
(Unknown)
Total Estimated
(Unknown)
(Unknown)
(Unknown)
FUND AFFECTED
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001 Administrative Funds
($0 or $33,300,000)
($0 or $40,000,000)
($0 or $40,000,000) Total Estimated
($0 or $33,300,000)*
($0 or $40,000,000)*
($0 or $40,000,000)*
FUND AFFECTED
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001 Local Government
$0
$0
$0
FISCAL IMPACT - Small BusinessFISCAL IMPACT -
State Government
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001
(10 Mo.)
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION TRUST FUND Cost - Department of Labor and Industrial Relations Loss of Employment Security Contributions
(Unknown)
(Unknown)
(Unknown) FISCAL IMPACT - State
Government
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001 (Continued)
(10 Mo.)
FEDERAL FUNDS Cost - Department of Labor and Industrial Relations Loss of Administrative
funds
($0 or
($0 or
($0 or
$33,300,000)
$40,000,000)
$40,000,000) FISCAL IMPACT -
Local Government
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001
(10 Mo.)
$0
$0
$0
Small businesses would expect to be fiscally impacted to the extent that Missouri's Employment Security Law falls out of conformity with Federal law, thus resulting in a loss of FUTA tax credits for contributing employers.
DESCRIPTION
This proposal provides for a reimbursable employer, who was formerly a contributing employer with an account balance, to use the former account balance to pay any unemployment benefits not chargeable.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations
United States Department of Labor
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
January 22, 1998