COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO. 3503-01
BILL NO. SB 902
SUBJECT: Boats and Watercrafts
TYPE: Original
DATE: February 24, 1998
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS Net Effect on All State Funds
FUND AFFECTED
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001 None
Total Estimated
$0
$0
$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
None | |||
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
Local Government | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses
This fiscal note contains 3 pages.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
The Department of Public Safety, Missouri State Water Patrol and the Missouri Sheriff's Association assume this proposal would not fiscally impact their agencies.
The Office of State Courts Administrator (CTS) states that this proposal prohibits large congregations of boats on state lakes, and that violations would be a misdemeanor. CTS assumes there may be an increased number of prosecutions for the first year or two in a few counties. However, after a period of adjustment, CTS assumes substantial compliance and would not anticipate a substantial increase in prosecutions or costs.
The State Public Defender (SPD) assumes existing staff could provide representation for the 20 to 30 cases arising where indigent persons were accused of "adjoining 20 or more boats together, or lake nudity, or having sex in front of others". However, passage of more than one similar proposal would require the SPD system to request increased appropriations to cover the cumulative cost of representing the indigent accused.
The Office of Prosecution Services and the Attorney General's Office did not respond to our fiscal impact request. Based on their response to a similar proposal from last session, Oversight assumes this proposal would not fiscally impact these agencies.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
$0 | $0 | $0 | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
$0 | $0 | $0 | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
DESCRIPTION
This proposal broadens the authority of the State Water Patrol to regulate certain activities on Missouri lakes. Motorized vessels will only be allowed to raft together in groups of twenty or less, with a minimum distance of three hundred feet between each group. Violations of these restrictions subject the owner or operator to a Class B misdemeanor for the first offense and a Class A misdemeanor thereafter. Failure to disperse an illegal raft of boats is a Class C misdemeanor.
This proposal also makes public nudity or sexual contact in a way which would likely cause affront or alarm a Class B misdemeanor for the first offense and a Class A misdemeanor thereafter. The Water Patrol may request and receive the help of a county sheriff or the State Highway Patrol. Sheriffs in counties bordering a lake will have authority to enforce the laws relating to boating, controlled substances, and crime in general when upon the lake. Vessels involved in drug felonies may be forfeited as provided in Chapter 513, RSMo. The proposal has an emergency clause.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Public Safety
Missouri State Water Patrol
State Public Defender's Office
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Missouri Sheriff's Association
NOT RESPONDING: Office of Prosecution Services and Attorney General's Office
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
February 24, 1998