COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO. 3506-01
BILL NO. Truly Agreed To And Finally Passed SB 861
SUBJECT: Transportation: Taxation and Revenue
TYPE: Original
DATE: April 28, 1998
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS Net Effect on All State Funds
FUND AFFECTED
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001 General Revenue
$0 to Unknown
$0 to Unknown
$0 to Unknown
Total Estimated
$0 to Unknown
$0 to Unknown
$0 to Unknown
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
Local Government* | $0 | $0 | $0 |
*This proposal is permissive.
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses
This fiscal note contains 4 pages. FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials of the Department of Transportation (DHT) and the State Treasurer's Office (STO) assume no fiscal impact.
Officials from the Department of Revenue (DOR) assume the fiscal impact of this proposal would be minimal. The additional administrative duties of collection could be absorbed by current appropriations.
The number of additional local sales taxes that would be imposed is unknown. Therefore, the amount of revenue that would be collected and the corresponding 1% collection fee that would be deposited to the General Revenue Fund is unknown.
Oversight assumes this proposal is permissive and would require approval by the voters to implement the sales tax. However, if such sales tax is approved and implemented each transportation district that approves this sales tax would realize an increase in total revenue. Since this tax increase is subject to voter approval, Oversight has shown the potential for increased income and costs as $0 to Unknown.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
GENERAL REVENUE FUND | |||
Income to Department of Revenue | |||
1% Collection Fee | $0 to | $0 to | $0 to |
Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT | |||
DISTRICT SALES TAX FUND | |||
Income to Transportation Districts | |||
Sales Tax | $0 to | $0 to | $0 to |
Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
(continued) | (10 Mo.) | ||
Costs to Transportation Districts | |||
Transportation Development | $0 to | $0 to | $0 to |
(Unknown) | (Unknown) | (Unknown) | |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT TO | |||
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS | |||
TRANSPORTATION | |||
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS* | $0 | $0 | $0 |
*Oversight assumes cost would not exceed income resulting in either a zero or positive fund balance annually. | |||
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
Small businesses located within a transportation development district would be fiscally impacted due to costs related to payment and collection of the sales tax.
DESCRIPTION
This act makes two changes to the law on transportation development districts.
SALES TAX- The act sets up an alternate sales tax collection method. The sales tax may be imposed in an area made up of a city, county, or combination thereof. The tax would be collected by the Department of Revenue (DOR) instead of by the District itself, and the DOR would remit the funds to the district, less a 1% charge.
MORTGAGES- Districts are prohibited from mortgaging any property acquired through eminent domain. They may not mortgage any property received from a state agency without that agency's consent.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Transportation
Department of Revenue
State Treasurer's Office
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
April 28, 1998