COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO. 3586-01
BILL NO. SB 830
SUBJECT: Taxation and Revenue - Property: Economic Development
TYPE: Original
DATE: February 8, 1998
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS Net Effect on All State
Funds
FUND AFFECTED
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001 General Revenue
$0
$0
$0
Total Estimated
$0
$0
$0
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
None | |||
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
Political Subdivisions | ($0 to Unknown) | ($0 to Unknown) | ($0 to Unknown) |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses
This fiscal note contains 3 pages.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials of the State Tax Commission stated losses of revenue to affected local governments would not be significant, that the effect on the Blind Pension Fund would be very small and that proposal would not cause the Commission to request any additional resources.
Officials of the Department of Economic Development and the Department of Natural Resources could not provide estimates of the value of equipment which might be affected by this proposal.
Oversight assumes that those political subdivisions which have tax rates lower than their tax rate ceilings would "roll up" tax rates on other property as much as possible to offset the loss of personal property tax.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
0 | 0 | 0 | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS | |||
Loss - Reduced Property Tax Collections | ($0 | ($0 | ($0 |
to | to | to | |
Unknown) | Unknown) | Unknown) | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business | |||
Any small businesses owning pollution control and retooling equipment or equipment used in the fabrication of computer microelectronics chips would be affected by this proposal.
DESCRIPTION
The proposal would: 1) reduce assessed valuation of pollution control equipment and retooling equipment used for introduction of new product lines or for improving existing products by companies located in state enterprise zones and identified in certain standard industry codes from one-third to twenty-five percent, and 2) provide a schedule for assessing equipment purchased after August 28, 1998, and used in the fabrication of computer microelectronics chips, based on years the equipment has been in service.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program, would not
require additional capital improvements or rental space. It would not materially affect Total State Revenue.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Economic Development
Department of Natural Resources
State Tax Commission
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
February 8, 1998