HB1080 | CLARIFIES WHEN CERTAIN NOTICES MUST BE GIVEN BY CERTAIN INSURERS. |
Sponsor: | Auer, Ron (59) | Effective Date:00/00/00 | |||
CoSponsor: | LR Number:2902-01 | ||||
Last Action: | 07/09/98 - Approved by Governor (G) | ||||
07/09/98 - Delivered to Secretary of State | |||||
HB1080 | |||||
Next Hearing: | Hearing not scheduled | ||||
Calendar: | Bill currently not on calendar | ||||
ACTIONS | HEARINGS | CALENDAR |
BILL SUMMARIES | BILL TEXT | FISCAL NOTES |
HOUSE HOME PAGE | BILL SEARCH | |
HB 1080 -- COMMERCIAL CASUALTY INSURANCE The bill specifies that an assignment or transfer of a commercial casualty policy among affiliated insurers in a holding company system is not considered a cancellation or nonrenewal of the policy. The bill also requires commercial casualty insurers to inform policyholders in renewal notices that they may request a written statement of the reasons for an increase in premiums. This requirement is effective January 1, 1999.
HB 1080 -- COMMERCIAL CASUALTY INSURANCE (Auer) The bill specifies that an assignment or transfer of a commercial casualty policy among affiliated insurers in an insurance company holding system is not considered a cancellation or nonrenewal of the policy. The bill also specifies that insurers are not required to notify their insureds of a change in any rating system component. FISCAL NOTE: No impact on state funds.
HB 1080 -- COMMERCIAL CASUALTY INSURANCE SPONSOR: Auer COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "do pass by consent" by the Committee on Insurance by a vote of 14 to 0. The bill specifies that an assignment or transfer of a commercial casualty policy among affiliated insurers in an insurance company holding system is not considered a cancellation or nonrenewal of the policy. The bill also specifies that insurers are not required to notify their insureds of a change in any rating system component. FISCAL NOTE: No impact on state funds. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that a notice of policy nonrenewal or cancellation should not be required because the policy is transferred to another company within the same insurance system. Also, the notice can cause confusion and panic for a policyholder who may then decide to switch insurance company. Testifying for the bill were Representative Auer; Missouri Insurance Coalition; American Insurance Association; and Independent Insurance Agents. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Marty Romitti, Legislative Analyst
HB 1080 -- Commercial Casualty Insurance Sponsor: Auer The bill specifies that an assignment or transfer of a commercial casualty policy among affiliated insurers in an insurance company holding system is not considered a cancellation or nonrenewal of the policy. The bill also specifies that insurers are not required to notify their insureds of a change in any rating system component.
Missouri House of Representatives' Home Page
Last Updated November 10, 1998 at 3:29 pm