COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO.: 0201-01
BILL NO.: SJR 4
SUBJECT: Constitutional Amendments: Taxation and Revenue - Elderly
TYPE: Original
DATE: January 8, 1999
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
Blind Pension | $0 | $0 | ($3,500,000) |
General Revenue | $0 | ($125,000) | $0 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All State Funds |
$0 | ($125,000) | ($3,500,000) |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
Local Government | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses
This fiscal note contains 3 pages.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials of the Department of Revenue and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DES) stated that the proposal would not affect their agencies, administratively.
DES officials also noted that school districts would receive their proportionate share of funds from the Merchants and Manufacturers Replacement Taxes (commercial property surtaxes). Therefore, there should not be any effect on the Foundation Formula.
Officials of the State TAX Commission estimated that the proposal would shift $680,000,000 in taxes to the commercial property surtaxes beginning with the 2001 assessment (FY 2002). Those surtaxes now yield about $130,000,000. They also noted that the State's Blind Pension Fund would not receive any replacement taxes and would lose about $3,500,000 beginning in FY 2002. (The assessed value of property affected would be about $11.67 billion by 2001. Property tax rates would average $5.82 per $100 assessed value. The Blind Pension tax is $.03 per $100 assessed value.)
Advertisement costs for the proposal would be $3,990 per newspaper column inch for three publications of the text of the proposal, the introduction, title, fiscal note summary, and affidavit. The proposal would be on the ballot for the November 2000 general election.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
GENERAL REVENUE FUND | |||
Cost to General Revenue Fund | |||
Secretary of State | |||
Newspaper Advertisements | $0 | ($125,000) | $0 |
NET EFFECT ON GENERAL | |||
REVENUE FUND | $0 | ($125,000) | $0 |
BLIND PENSION FUND | |||
Loss - Decreased Tax Receipts | $0 | $0 | ($3,500,000) |
NET EFFECT ON BLIND | |||
PENSION FUND | $0 | $0 | ($3,500,000) |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
Income - Increase in Commercial Property | |||
Surtax Collections | $0 | $0 | $680,000,000 |
Loss - Decrease in Real and Personal | |||
Property Tax Collections | $0 | $0 | ($680,000,000) |
NET EFFECT ON POLITICAL | |||
SUBDIVISIONS | $0 | $0 | $0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business | |||
This proposal could affect property taxes paid by small businesses.
DESCRIPTION
This proposal would place before the voters of Missouri a proposal to exempt real and personal property of persons over sixty-four from property taxes and to replace local government revenues lost due to the exemption with increase in the taxes imposed on subclass 3 (commercial) property.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space. The proposal would affect Total State Revenue.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Department of Revenue
Secretary of State
State Tax Commission
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
January 9, 1999