COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO.: 0644-07
BILL NO.: Truly Agreed and Finally Passed HCS for SCS for SB 275
SUBJECT: Revenue department.
TYPE: Original
DATE: April 22, 1999
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
None | |||
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All State Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
None | |||
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
Local Government | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses
This fiscal note contains 3 pages.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
The Office of Prosecution Services, Office of Administration, Office of the State Treasurer, Office of the State Auditor, and the Office of the State Courts Administrator assume the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.
In response to a similar proposal, the Department of Revenue assumed the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on their agency.
Oversight assumes that there have been no transfers from the Missouri Office of Prosecution Services Fund to the General Revenue Fund pursuant to section 33.080, RSMo; therefore, no state fund balances would change.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
0 | 0 | 0 | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
0 | 0 | 0 | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business | |||
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal. | |||
DESCRIPTION
This proposal allows any unexpended balances in the Missouri Office of Prosecution Services (MOPS) fund and revolving fund to remain in the respective account and not transfer to general revenue; names the state treasurer as custodian of the MOPS fund and states that any interest shall be credited to the MOPS fund; removes the restriction that no other moneys from general revenue or any other source shall be used to fund the office; and deletes the provision that the office staff shall consist of "not more than three persons".
DESCRIPTION (continued)
Assistant prosecuting attorneys are not required to meet the same qualifications as prosecuting attorneys. This proposal deletes provisions which are outdated due to demographic changes, and
makes other technical revisions to current laws concerning prosecuting attorneys.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program, and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of Prosecution Services
Office of the State Treasurer
Office of the State Courts Administrator
Office of Administration-Division of Accounting
Office of the State Auditor
NOT RESPONDING: Department of Revenue
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
April 22, 1999