COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO. 652-01
BILL NO. SB 179 with SCA # 1
SUBJECT: Contracts
TYPE: Original
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS Net Effect on All State Funds
FUND AFFECTED
FY 2000
FY 2001
FY 2002 General Revenue
Unknown to (Unknown)
Unknown to (Unknown)
Unknown to (Unknown)
Total Estimated
Unknown to (Unknown)
Unknown to (Unknown)
Unknown to (Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
None | |||
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
Local Government | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses
This fiscal note contains 3 pages.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials of the Department of Transportation, Department of Economic Development, Division of Professional Registration, and Office of Administration, Division of Design and Construction (DDC) and the Division of Facilities Management assume this proposal would not fiscally impact their agencies.
Oversight assumes that combining the design and construction of a facility into one contract may affect the total cost of the project. Savings could be realized since one "design-builder" is responsible for the total project, and DDC would not have to contract out the design and construction functions separately. However, Oversight further assumes there may be additional costs associated with this proposal, as it requires DDC to pay a stipend to each unsuccessful proposer in return for their rights in the design. Because design-builders may choose to forfeit this fee to retain the rights to their design, the costs for these fees cannot be estimated.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
GENERAL REVENUE | |||
Savings due to design-build contracts | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
Costs - Stipend for rights to designs | (Unknown) | (Unknown) | (Unknown) |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT |
Unknown to | Unknown to | Unknown to |
ON GENERAL REVENUE | (Unknown) | (Unknown) | (Unknown) |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
$0 | $0 | $0 | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business | |||
This proposal may affect small businesses as it may decrease the number of businesses capable of bidding on both the design and construction of a facility. | |||
DESCRIPTION
This proposal allows the Division of Design and Construction of the Office of Administration to simultaneously contract for the design and construction of a building. Proposals would be solicited in a three-phase process. Phase I would be the solicitation of qualifications of the design-build team; phase II would be the solicitation of a technical proposal including conceptual design for the project; and phase III would be the proposal of the construction cost. An evaluation team would review the submittals of the proposers and assign points to each proposal in accordance with this legislation. The proposer with the highest total number of points would be awarded the contract. The Division would pay a stipend to all unsuccessful proposers and it would retain all rights to the design.
The prevailing wage provisions of sections 290.210 to 290.340, RSMo, shall not apply to the remodeling of any building leased by the Office of Administration.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program, and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of Administration
Division of Design and Construction
Division of Facilities Management
Department of Transportation
Department of Economic Development
Division of Professional Registration
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
February 26, 1999