COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO.: 0656-01
BILL NO.: SB 522
SUBJECT: Debit Services
TYPE: Original
DATE: March 18, 1999
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
None | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All State Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
None | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
Local Government | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses
This fiscal note contains 3 pages.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials of the Department of Economic Development - Divisions of Finance and Credit Unions, Office of State Courts Administrator, and the Department of Social Services assume the proposal would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.
Officials of the Office of State Public Defender assume that existing staff could provide representation for 50-100 indigent persons charged with the new crime of fraudulent use of a debit device. However, passage of more than one similar bill would require the state public defender system to request increased appropriations to cover the cumulative cost of representing the indigent accused in the additional cases.
Officials of the Department of Corrections (DOC) indicate that they cannot predict the number of new commitments which may result from the creation of the offense(s) outlined in the proposal. An increase in commitments would depend on the utilization by prosecutors and the actual sentences imposed by the court. If additional persons were to be sentenced to the custody of DOC due to this proposal, the DOC would incur a corresponding increase in operational costs either through incarceration (average of $35 per inmate, per day) or through supervision provided by the Board of Probation and Parole (average of $3.50 per offender, per day). However, DOC has assumed that the fiscal impact to the department would be $0 or a minimal amount that could be absorbed within existing resources due to the following assumptions:
The Office of Prosecution Services did not respond to a request for estimate of fiscal impact.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
0 | 0 | 0 | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
(10 Mo.) | |||
0 | 0 | 0 | |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business | |||
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal. | |||
DESCRIPTION
The proposal would create the crime of fraudulent use of a debit device. The crime would be classified as a class A misdemeanor for thefts of less than $150 and a class D felony for thefts of $150 or more.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Corrections
Office of State Public Defender
Office of State Courts Administrator
Department of Economic Development - Divisions of Finance and Credit Unions
Department of Social Services
NOT RESPONDING: Office of Prosecution Services
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
March 18, 1999