COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO. 1275-01
BILL NO. Perfected SB 287
SUBJECT: Taxation and Revenue-Property: Motor Vehicles
TYPE: Original
DATE: March 25, 1999
FISCAL SUMMARY
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON STATE FUNDS Net Effect on All State
Funds
FUND AFFECTED
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001 Blind Pension
$0
(Unknown)
(Unknown)
Total Estimated
$0
(Unknown)
(Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
None | |||
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS | |||
FUND AFFECTED | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
Political Subdivisions | $0 | ($0 to Unknown) | ($0 to Unknown) |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses
This fiscal note contains 4 pages.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTION
Officials of the State Tax Commission, Department of Agriculture and the Cole County Assessor stated that the proposal would not have meaningful administrative impact on their agencies. The Assessor did note that section 6 of article X of the state constitution lists property which the general assembly may exempt from property taxes.
Tax Commission officials, while assuming that net losses could be significant have no means of estimating the value of property of not-for-profit agribusiness associations.
Oversight notes that political subdivisions are required to adjust property tax rates to take into account changes in assessed valuation by section 137.073. Rates may be rolled back or "rolled up" to the tax rate ceiling. There will be three possible effects on political subdivisions:
1) Some subdivisions will have tax rates far enough below their tax rate ceilings that they will be able to "roll up" their rates enough to entirely offset losses due to the exemption;
2) Some subdivisions will be able to "roll up" their rates enough to partially offset losses due to the exemption; and
3) Some subdivisions will not be able to "roll up" tax rates because their rates are at their tax rate ceiling.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
BLIND PENSION FUND | |||
Loss - Reduced Tax Collections | $0 | ($Unknown) | (Unknown) |
NET EFFECT ON BLIND | |||
PENSION FUND | $0 | ($Unknown) | (Unknown) |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS | |||
Income - Higher Tax Rates | $0 | $0 | $0 |
to | to | ||
Unknown | Unknown | ||
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 |
Loss - Reduced Personal Property Tax Collections | $0 | (Unknown) | (Unknown) |
NET EFFECT ON | |||
POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS | $0 | ($0 | ($0 |
TO | TO | ||
UNKNOWN) | UNKNOWN) | ||
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business | |||
This proposal would affect small businesses. Not-for-profit agribusiness associations could benefit from the proposal. Other businesses could pay higher taxes on other taxable property due to tax rate adjustments. | |||
DESCRIPTION
The proposal would exempt property of not-for-profit agribusiness associations from property taxes.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program, would not
require additional capital improvements or rental space. It would affect Total State Revenue.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Cole County Assessor
Department of Agriculture
State Tax Commission
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
March 25, 1999