COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 0126-02

Bill No.: SB 183

Subject: Motor Vehicles; Licenses- Motor Vehicle, Revenue Dept.; Licenses- Driver's

Type: Original

Date: January 13, 2003




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
General Revenue* Unknown Unknown Unknown
Total Estimated

Net Effect on

General Revenue

Fund

Unknown Unknown Unknown

*Total unknown revenue for GR Fund and Dedicated DHT Fund expected to exceed $100,000.

ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Dedicated DHT* Unknown Unknown Unknown
Highway** ($407,133) to Unknown ($236,823) to Unknown ($240,013) to Unknown
Total Estimated

Net Effect on Other

State Funds

($407,133) to Unknown ($236,823) to Unknown ($240,013) to Unknown

**Unknown revenue for Highway is expected to exceed $100,000

Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 8 pages.

















ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Local Government $7,627 $11,485 $11,485




FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials with the Office of Prosecution Services and Office of State Courts assume this proposal would have no significant fiscal impact on their agencies.



The Department of Revenue (DOR) assume that section 301.140.6 of this proposal could require DOR to incorporate a security feature on the temporary permit or paper plate that prevents tampering with any information that is entered when it is issued. DOR assumes that their current features comply with this proposal. However, if the intent of the legislation is to change the structure of the current permit to a more substantial security feature then DOR could incur cost. The cost of an upgraded security permit would be a total of $.35 per permit. The current cost is $.10 per permit. Therefore, DOR would pay a premium of $.25 for each permit.



DOR-Driver and Vehicle Services Bureau (DVSB) assume that an initial purchase of 400,000 would be needed to replace the temporary permit stock. In addition, DVSB would continue to purchase 600,000 permits per year











ASSUMPTION (continued)



FY 04

400,000 permits to replace the current stock at $.35 each $140,000

600,000 permits with a $.25 premium (normal $.10) $150,000

Total $290,000



FY05

600,000 permits with a $.25 premium (normal $.10) $150,000



FY06

600,000 permits with a $.25 premium (normal $.10) $150,000



Officials with DOR assume that section 301.140.7 of the proposal could require all dealers who issue temporary permits or paper plates to notify DOR within 48 hours of issuance. DOR further assumes this section has the intent for DOR to collect delinquent sales tax on the vehicles which have not been registered within thirty days of purchase.



DOR assumes there could be revenue generated from the increase in temporary permits sold, sales tax collected and registration fees submitted as a result of the increase in tracking these permits. However, the agency could not determine the exact amount of revenue this will generate. This revenue is expected to exceed $100,000.



DVSB could incur costs for mailing notices to field offices, dealers and notifying individuals that they have failed to register their vehicle and pay their sales tax in a timely manner. DVSB estimates that approximately 20% of the individuals that were issued temporary permits do not register and pay their sales tax. For FY02, 580,028 temporary permits were issued. Twenty percent of these (116,006) could be potential delinquent sales tax payers.



The DOR-Information Technology Bureau (ITB) assume they could require approximately 700 hours of programming to modify existing tracking systems and program the upfront Web Site to allow dealers to report their sales.



DVSB could also incur cost for record storage at the State Data Center.















ASSUMPTION (continued)



FY 04

Salaries-Programming $16,140

Record Storage $1,000

Mailing to offices and dealers $ 530

Mailing to delinquent owners $24,361

Total $42,031



FY 05

Record Storage $300

Mailing to delinquent owners (3% growth) $50,184

Total $50,484



FY 06

Record Storage $300

Mailing to delinquent owners (3% growth) $51,690

Total $51,990



DOR assumes that section 301.140.9 of this proposal could create a class C misdemeanor for any person who knowingly alters, counterfeits or misuses a temporary permit or paper plate to avoid registering a motor vehicle. It could also require DOR to suspend a person's driver license that has been convicted of altering, counterfeiting or misusing the temporary permit or paper plate for a period of sixty days.



580,028 Number of temporary permits sold in FY02

x 20% Estimated percentage of drivers who fraudulently use temporary permits

116,005 Estimated number of fraudulent permits

x 6% Estimated percentage of drivers to be convicted of altering a temporary permit

6,960 Estimated number of "Orders of Suspensions" received per year

x 33% Estimated percent of reinstatement

2296 Estimated number of reinstated licences.















ASSUMPTION (continued)



DVSB assumes there could be a $20 reinstatement fee for the 'temporary permit 60 day driver license suspensions'. This could generate the following revenue.

FY04 (8 mos) FY 05 FY 06

Highways $22,970 $34,455 $34,455

Cities $4,594 $6,891 $6,891

Counties $3,063 $4,594 $4,594

Total $30,627 $45,940 $45,940



(Because this suspension is a 60 day suspension and the effective date of the legislation is August 28, 2003, DVSB assumes reinstatements will only be generated in FY04 for 8 months.)



DVSB could require 2 Revenue Licensing Technicians I (salaries and equipment) in order to process the suspensions and respond to inquires. In addition, DVSB could incur cost for postage of the suspensions and reinstatements.



ITB assumes the creation of a new 60 day driver license suspension type could result in programming cost to update the current system. ITB estimates that it could require approximately 1040 hours of programming.



FY 04

Programming $25,729

2 FTE for processing additional suspensions $35,569

Fringe Benefits $14,694

Equipment for FTE (one time) $13,394

Expense of FTE $4,423

Mailing of notices $4,563

Total $98,372



FY 05

2 FTE (2.5 percent increase) $42,681

Fringe Benfits $17,273

Equipment and Expense $5,467

Mailing of notices $5,368

Total $70,789







ASSUMPTION (continued)



FY 06

2 FTE (2.5 percent increase) $43,748

Fringe Benfits $17,705

Expense of FTE $5,632

Mailing of suspension notices $5,388

Total $72,473



Oversight has, for fiscal note purposes only, changed the starting salary for Revenue Licensing Technician I to correspond to the second step above minimum for comparable positions in the state's merit system pay grid. This decision reflects a study of actual starting salaries for new state employees for a six month period and the policy of the Oversight Subcommittee of the Joint Committee on Legislative Research.



To implement this legislation, DOR could require additional funds. In the past, the programs included in this legislation have been paid for with highway funds. This year, however, highway funds may not be available for this purpose as a result of legislation enacted by the General Assembly in 2000 that limits the use of highway funds.



This limitation is found in Section 226.200.3, RSMo. It places a cap on the highway funding available to state departments other than the Department of Transportation. The total amount of highway funds appropriated to these other state departments (including DOR) cannot exceed the total amount of their fiscal year 2001.



FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2004

(10 Mo.)

FY 2005 FY 2006
GENERAL REVENUE
Income
Increase in vehicle sales tax Unknown Unknown Unknown
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE



UNKNOWN


UNKNOWN


UNKNOWN
DEDICATED DHT FUND
Income
Increase in vehicle sales tax Unknown Unknown Unknown
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON DEDICATED DHT FUND

UNKNOWN


UNKNOWN


UNKNOWN
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2004

(10 Mo.)

FY 2005 FY 2006
HIGHWAY FUND
Income-Department of Revenue
Additional permits Unknown Unknown Unknown
Additional registration fees Unknown Unknown Unknown
Reinstatement Fee (8 mo) $22,970 $34,450 $34,450
Total Income- DOR Unknown exceeding $22,970 Unknown exceeding $34,450 Unknown exceeding $34,450
Cost-Department of Revenue
Upgrade Permits ($290,000) ($150,000) ($150,000)
Salaries-Programming ($41,869) $0 $0
Salaries- 2 FTE ($35,569) ($42,681) ($43,748)
Fringe Benefits ($14,394) ($17,273) ($17,705)
Equipment and Expense ($17,817) ($5,467) ($5,632)
Mailing ($29,454) ($55,552) ($57,078)
Record Storage ($1,000) ($300) ($300)
Total Cost- DOR ($430,103) ($271,273) ($274,463)
NET ESTIMATED EFFECT ON HIGHWAY FUND ($407,133) to Unknown ($236,823) to Unknown ($240,013) to Unknown



FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2004

(10 Mo.)

FY 2005 FY 2006
Income-Cities
Reinstatement Fee $4,564 $6,891 $6,891
Income-Counties
Reinstatement Fee $3,063 $4,594 $4,594
$7,627 $11,485 $11,485



FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



This proposal could have direct fiscal impact to small businesses. They could be expected to notify DOR within 48 hours when they have sold a vehicle and issued a temporary permit.







DESCRIPTION



This proposal could require security features on temporary registration tags and make it a crime to counterfeit or alter the tags.



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Department of Revenue

Office of State Courts

Office of Prosecution Services





Mickey Wilson, CPA

Director

January 13, 2003