COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH

OVERSIGHT DIVISION



FISCAL NOTE



L.R. No.: 0689-01

Bill No.: SB 196

Subject: Department of Corrections; Political Subdivisions; State Departments

Type: Original

Date: February 3, 2003




FISCAL SUMMARY



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON GENERAL REVENUE FUND
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
General Revenue* (Unknown) (Unknown) (Unknown)
Total Estimated

Net Effect on

General Revenue

Fun

(Unknown) (Unknown) (Unknown)

*Could exceed ($100,000) in any given fiscal year.



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON OTHER STATE FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
All State Funds (Unknown) to Unknown (Unknown) to Unknown (Unknown) to Unknown
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

State Funds

(Unknown) to Unknown (Unknown) to Unknown (Unknown) to Unknown



Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.

This fiscal note contains 9 pages.











ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
None
Total Estimated

Net Effect on All

Federal Funds

$0 $0 $0



ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON LOCAL FUNDS
FUND AFFECTED FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Local Government $0 $0 $0




FISCAL ANALYSIS



ASSUMPTION



Officials from the Office of Administration - Division of Design and Construction, Department of Economic Development - Public Service Commission, Department of Mental Health, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, Department of Revenue, Department of Public Safety - Capitol Police, - Missouri State Water Patrol, - Division of Fire Safety, - Office of Adjutant General, - Division of Liquor Control, - State Emergency Management Agency, - Missouri State Highway Patrol, - Director's Office, - Division of Highway Safety, - Veterans Commission, Office of Governor, Department of Insurance, Missouri House of Representatives, Office of Lieutenant Governor, Office of State Auditor, Missouri Senate, State Tax Commission, Central Missouri State University, Harris-Stowe State College, Missouri Western State College, Truman State University, Southwest Missouri State University, and the University of Missouri assume the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.





ASSUMPTION (continued)



Officials from the Office of Administration - Division of Purchasing and Materials Management (DPMM) assume the proposal could increase the number of bid solicitation documents produced by the DPMM. This increase in documents would be for items that were previously purchased directly from Missouri Vocational Enterprises and now would be purchased through the competitive bid process. However, DPMM assumes the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on their agency.



Officials from the Department of Natural Resources assume the proposal would result in minimal fiscal impact.



Officials from the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) assume the proposal would require the state to evaluate, on a competitive basis, purchases from the vocational enterprise program in any case where one or more existing Missouri business can provide such goods or services.



DESE has spent approximately $95,000 with MVE for FY 03. DESE typically purchases such items as envelopes, furniture, cleaner, communication services, and paper. All these services can be provided by outside vendors, so DESE would be required to evaluate whether the vocational enterprises program can best meet their needs in terms of price, quality, and time of delivery; therefore, DESE would likely seek competitive bids. DESE cannot know whether they would receive better prices, quality, and delivery; however, experience has shown that the bidding process generally divulges better prices. There would be additional administration costs for DESE because of the additional work required in bidding out these products and services. It is unknown whether the results of competitive bidding would offset the additional work required.



DESE assumes public schools would not qualify as a public institution owned, managed, or controlled by the state.



Officials from the Department of Social Services (DOS) state they make several thousand purchases from Missouri Vocational Enterprises each year. Most of these transactions fall into the two broad categories of furniture and recycled printing cartridges. Both of these products are sold by Missouri businesses, so an evaluation would be required and the bidding requirement would seem to apply. DOS assumes the additional work could be absorbed by existing staff.



Officials from the Office of State Treasurer assume the proposal would have a small unknown positive impact to their office.



ASSUMPTION (continued)



Officials from the Office of Secretary of State (SOS) assume the average number of annual purchase orders from SOS to MVE is 150. This estimate is based upon actual prior fiscal year data. The SOS assumes the same number of bids, 150, would need to be conducted on an annual basis in order to comply with the terms of the proposed legislation. Under the proposed legislation the bid process would have to be completed for products or services provided by MVE without regard to which vendor sere the successful bidder, an existing Missouri business or MVE. The issuance of a purchase order would be delayed approximately 15 days in order to complete the bid process.



The average time involved in conducting a bid is approximately 14 staff hours. Thus, the mandatory requirement to conduct bids for products or services provided by MVE would result in an increase of approximately 2100 staff hours annually (150 bids x 14 staff hours), resulting in the need for an additional FTE Procurement Officer I (at $37,488 per year). The SOS estimates the cost of the proposal to be $62,200 in FY 04; $61,366 in FY 05; and $62,893 in FY 06.



Officials from the Department of Transportation (MoDOT) assume this legislation may result in a cost savings for MoDOT due to the ability to purchase items from an open market; however, the requirement that these items be competitively bid will increase MoDOT's cost when performing a competitive market analysis for each purchase. This legislation will require all items purchased be competitively bid; however, under other procurement laws, competition is not required until the acquisition value reaches $3,000.



MoDOT currently contracts with the MVE for the recycling of waste tires and tire pieces that are removed from the right-of-way by MoDOT. The competitively bid requirement would result in MVE being awarded the contract or a commercial business being awarded the contract at a price lower than the current MVE price. Due to the unknown outcome, MoDOT is unable to determine a fiscal impact.



Officials from the Department of Conservation (MDC) assume the proposed legislation could have a positive fiscal impact on MDC funds since Missouri businesses other than Missouri Vocational Enterprises may be used.



Oversight assumes state agencies could experience an increase cost of an unknown amount due to the bidding process. Oversight also assumes state agencies could experience savings of an unknown amount due to the decreased cost of goods and services as a result of the bidding process.





ASSUMPTION (continued)



Officials from the Department of Corrections (DOC) assume that removing the statutory requirement that state agencies purchase products and services from MVE will greatly affect MVE's revenue. The potential exists to force MVE to dissolve. Passage of the bill will cause a chain reaction throughout the agency. Inmate canteens where MVE programs once were will struggle with profits due to the fact that inmate wages would be greatly reduced. Canteen funds provide vocational and educational necessities for the inmates which would then have to be purchased with General Revenue funds. MVE's Working Capital Revolving fund, a self-sustaining fund whose funds do not lapse annually, will diminish.



It is possible that approximately $19,680,914 in annual revenue would be at stake. This is the total revenue ($25,168,381) minus the non-state public entity revenue ($5,130,592) minus the goods and services sold to state employees ($356,875)(FY02 data). It is also assumed that sales to state entities would be at risk.



The revenue from MVE in the Working Capital Revolving Account funds several key functions within the DOC which could be jeopardized:







ASSUMPTION (continued)



The following chart details the MVE programs and the revenue generated from each. The difference between the revenue listed on the spreadsheet breakout and the $25,168,381 listed above is from rental property income. MVE leases property which generates income.



Industry Site Offender Employees State Employees Revenue
Clothing CCC 26 2 $266,104
Data Entry CCC discontinued discontinued $47,310
Cartridge Recycling CMCC 16 1 $328,596
Quick Print CMCC 15 3 $455,238
Tire Recycling CMCC 28 10 $712,424
Shoes CMCC 12 1 $546,239
Furniture CRCC 91 4 $578,053
Laundry FCC 216 18 $2,288,141
Clothing FCC 31 3 $985,188
Clothing MSP 73 7 $119,153
Chemical/Dry Cleaning MSP 41 6 $1,755,570
Office Systems MSP 19 13 $530,974
License Plates MSP 28 4 $2,247,150
Plastic Bags MSP 13 1 $54,684
Furniture MSP 70 8 $939,870
Graphic Arts and Engraving MSP 32 4 $1,573,154
Office Systems NECC 58 5 $2,301,843
Laundry MCC 160 12 $1,349,781
Metal MCC 70 5 $906,488
Sign Shop MCC 52 5 $1,001,311
Print Shop MCC 43 4 $1,460,914
Furniture MECC 87 3 $760,065
Chair Frame PCC 19 2 $208,328
Chair TCC 44 2 $1,307,448
Clothing WERDCC 97 4 $1,217,443
Administration 57 $342,665
Vocational Education 30 $2,120
Total 1341 214 $24,286,254


In summary, although the exact fiscal impact is unknown, it is estimated that potential costs will be in excess of $100,000 per year.







ASSUMPTION (continued)



Officials from the Department of Agriculture, Department of Health and Senior Services, Missouri Lottery Commission, Lincoln University, Missouri Southern State College, Northwest Missouri State University, and Southeast Missouri State University did not respond to Oversight's request for fiscal impact.



FISCAL IMPACT - State Government FY 2004

(10 Mo.)

FY 2005 FY 2006
ALL STATE FUNDS*
Savings - Various State Agencies
Decreased costs due to competition Unknown Unknown Unknown
Costs - Various State Agencies

Increased costs due to bid process



(Unknown)

(Unknown)



(Unknown)
Losses - Department of Corrections
Lost MVE revenue (Unknown) (Unknown) (Unknown)
ESTIMATED NET EFFECT ON ALL STATE FUNDS*

(Unknown) to Unknown


(Unknown) to Unknown


(Unknown) to Unknown


*Impact to General Revenue Fund could exceed ($100,000) in any given fiscal year.





FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government FY 2004

(10 Mo.)

FY 2005 FY 2006
$0 $0 $0





FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business



The proposed legislation could have a fiscal impact on small businesses.







DESCRIPTION



Under this proposed legislation, the state and its agencies would no longer give Missouri Vocational Enterprises favorable status when purchasing goods and services. Agencies would be required to accept competitive bids for goods and services from Missouri businesses.



This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.





SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Office of Administration

- Division of Purchasing and Materials Management

- Division of Design and Construction

Department of Economic Development

- Public Service Commission

Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Department of Transportation

Department of Mental Health

Department of Natural Resources

Department of Corrections

Department of Labor and Industrial Relations

Department of Revenue

Department of Social Services

Department of Public Safety

- Capitol Police

- Missouri State Water Patrol

- Division of Fire Safety

- Office of Adjutant General

- Division of Liquor Control

- State Emergency Management Agency

- Missouri State Highway Patrol

- Director's Office

- Division of Highway Safety

- Veterans Commission

Office of Governor

Department of Insurance

Department of Conservation

Missouri House of Representatives

SOURCES OF INFORMATION (continued)



Office of Lieutenant Governor

Office of State Auditor

Office of Secretary of State

Missouri Senate

State Tax Commission

Office of State Treasurer

Central Missouri State University

Harris-Stowe State College

Missouri Western State College

Truman State University

Southwest Missouri State University

University of Missouri



NOT RESPONDING



Department of Agriculture

Department of Health and Senior Services

Missouri Lottery Commission

Lincoln University

Missouri Southern State College

Northwest Missouri State University

Southeast Missouri State University













Mickey Wilson, CPA

Director

February 3, 2003