COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. NO.: 4491-01
BILL NO.: SB 1015
SUBJECT: Retirement: Kansas City Police and Civilian Employees
TYPE: Original
DATE: March 3, 2000
FISCAL SUMMARY
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2001 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
None | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All State Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2001 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
None | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2001 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
Local Government | $0* | $0* | $0* |
*DOES NOT REFLECT INCREASE IN UNFUNDED ACTUARIAL ACCRUED LIABILITY OF THE KANSAS CITY POLICE AND CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEMS WHICH ARE NOT CONSIDERED LOCAL FUNDS FOR FISCAL NOTE PURPOSES.
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.
This fiscal note contains 4 pages.
ASSUMPTION
Officials of the Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement have reviewed this proposal and have determined that it does not represent a "substantial proposed change" in future plan benefits as defined in section 105.660(5), RSMo. Therefore, an actuarial cost statement is not required.
Officials of the Office of Administration assume that any fiscal impact would be determined by the Kansas City Police Retirement System.
Officials of the Kansas City Police and Civilian Employees' Retirement Systems obtained an actuarial analysis of the proposal which indicated that the provisions that would result in costs to the systems are as follows:
The systems' actuary notes that the analysis is based on assumptions used in the May 1, 1999 actuarial valuation, except that it reflects a change to the averaging period for calculating the actuarial value of assets from five years to three years (when spreading investment gains and losses). The actuary concluded that the proposed contribution rate schedule, which includes an increase in member contributions only, is actuarially sufficient to provide the current legislated retirement benefits plus those included in this proposal, assuming the retirement board approves the change in the method for asset valuation. On that basis, no additional increase in City or member contributions would be necessary to fund this proposal.
Oversight notes that while there is fiscal impact to the Police and Civilian Employees' Retirement Systems, there is no immediate cost to the City of Kansas City as a result of this proposal. Funds of the retirement systems are not considered local funds for fiscal note purposes. There will be long-term fiscal impact as a result of this legislation, since an increase in
ASSUMPTION (continued)
the system's liabilities will contribute to any need for increased future contributions from the City of Kansas City.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government |
FY 2001
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government |
FY 2001
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
$0* | $0* | $0* |
*DOES NOT REFLECT INCREASE IN UNFUNDED ACTUARIAL ACCRUED LIABILITY OF KANSAS CITY POLICE AND CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, WHICH ARE NOT CONSIDERED LOCAL FUND FOR FISCAL NOTE PURPOSES.
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
DESCRIPTION
This proposal makes several changes and clarifications in statutes pertaining to the Kansas City Police and Civilian Employees' Retirement System. Among the changes are:
(1) The Board may grant cost of living adjustments of up to three percent per year for both police and civilian retirees.
(2) Surviving spouses of police officers will be permitted to remarry without loss of pension benefits.
(3) The minimum base pension for police retirees will be $600 per month.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Joint Committee on Public Employee Retirement
Office of Administration
Kansas City Police and Civilian Employees' Retirement Systems
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
March 3, 2000