COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
OVERSIGHT DIVISION
FISCAL NOTE
L.R. No.: 0429-01
Bill No.: SB 37
Subject: Crimes and Punishment: Anhydrous Ammonia and Liquid Nitrogen
Type: Original
Date: January 12, 2001
FISCAL SUMMARY
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 |
General Revenue Fund | (less than $100,000) | (less than $100,000) | (less than $100,000) |
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All State Funds |
(less than $100,000) | (less than $100,000) | (less than $100,000) |
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 |
None | |||
Total Estimated
Net Effect on All Federal Funds |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
FUND AFFECTED | FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 |
Local Government | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Numbers within parentheses: ( ) indicate costs or losses.
This fiscal note contains 4 pages.
ASSUMPTION
Officials from the Office of State Courts Administrator and the Office of Prosecution Services assume the proposed legislation would have no fiscal impact on their agencies.
Officials from the Department of Corrections (DOC) stated that they could not predict the number of new commitments which could result from the creation of the offense(s) outlined in the proposal. An increase in commitments would depend on the utilization of prosecutors and the actual sentences imposed by the courts. If additional persons were sentenced to the custody of the DOC due to the provisions of this legislation, the DOC would incur a corresponding increase in operational costs either through incarceration (FY99 average $35.61 per inmate, per day) or through supervision provided by the Board of Probation and Parole (FY 99 average $2.47 per offender, per day). Supervision by the DOC through probation or incarceration would result in some additional costs, but DOC officials assume that the impact would be $0 or a minimal amount that could be absorbed within existing resources.
The following factors contribute to DOC's minimal assumption:
If long-range fiscal impact would prove to be an amount in excess of that which could be absorbed by DOC, any costs profiled in this fiscal note would be requested through normal budgetary request procedures for the time periods affected by passage of this legislation.
The need for additional capital improvements or rental space is not anticipated at this time. It must be noted that the cumulative effect of various new legislation, if adopted, could result in the need for additional capital improvements funding if the total number of new offenders exceeds current planned capacity.
Oversight assumes that the conviction and incarceration of only one person would create a minimal fiscal impact of less than $100,000 annually.
Officials from the Office of the State Public Defender (SPD) assume that existing staff could provide representation for those 25-50 cases arising where indigent persons were accused of the theft or attempted theft of anhydrous ammonia or liquid nitrogen. However, passage of more than one similar proposal could require the SPD to request increased appropriations to cover the cumulative cost of representing the indigent accused.
FISCAL IMPACT - State Government | FY 2002
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2003 | FY 2004 |
Cost - Department of Corrections Incarceration/Probation costs |
(Less than $100,000) |
(Less than $100,000) |
(Less than $100,000) |
FISCAL IMPACT - Local Government | FY 2002
(10 Mo.) |
FY 2003 | FY 2004 |
$0 | $0 | $0 |
FISCAL IMPACT - Small Business
No direct fiscal impact to small businesses would be expected as a result of this proposal.
DESCRIPTION
This proposed legislation would classify as a class D felony the theft of liquid nitrogen or the attempt to steal any amount of anhydrous ammonia or liquid nitrogen. It also provides owners, operators, buyers, sellers, installers, and certain others, of anhydrous ammonia containers or equipment with immunity from civil liability and suits filed by persons who engage in unauthorized tampering with such containers and equipment.
This legislation is not federally mandated, would not duplicate any other program and would not require additional capital improvements or rental space. The proposal would not affect Total State Revenue.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Department of Corrections
Office of State Courts Administrator
Office of Prosecution Services
Office of the State Public Defender
Jeanne Jarrett, CPA
Director
January 12, 2001