Senator Karla May's May Report for the Week of Feb. 17, 2025
Friday, February 21, 2025
The Week of Feb. 17, 2025 |
On the Floor This week, the Senate gave first round approval to the following bills:
Additionally, the Senate passed the following legislation and sent them to the Missouri House of Representatives for consideration:
Additionally, this act provides that a person will be immune from prosecution if the person can establish he or she rendered aid to the hazing victim before assistance arrived.
Bills and Committees Senator May’s legislation: This week, two of my bills were reported from the Senate Progress and Development Committee. Senate Bill 110 would designate the week of January 5 each year as “Kappa Alpha Psi Week” in Missouri. Senate Bill 111 would designate September every year as "Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month" in Missouri. The next stop is the perfection calendar, where they can be brought up for discussion on the Senate floor
Judiciary Committee: The committee heard the following bills this week:
Commerce Committee: The committee heard two bills this week. Senate Bill 185 would authorize a state and local sales tax exemption for machinery and equipment used to provide broadband communications service by a broadband communications service provider. Senate Bill 199 states that the authority of any electrical corporation to condemn property does not extend to the construction of any structure or facility that uses wind or solar energy to generate or manufacture electricity.
Rules, Joint Rules, Resolutions and Ethics Committee: The committee heard Senate Concurrent Resolution 8, which would establish the Joint Committee on Drainage and Levee Districts. This committee would evaluate the current law on the creation, maintenance and methods of assessment for levee and drainage districts, as well as make recommendations to the General Assembly on changes that can be made to improve the transparency and operation of levee and drainage districts.
Appropriations Committee: The following departments and offices shared their funding requests for the Fiscal Year 2026 state operating budget in this week’s hearing:
Other News House votes to ban DEI, governor issues order doing same The Missouri House of Representatives voted 108-50 along straight party lines on Feb. 20 to ban state agencies from promoting diversity, equity and inclusion. The vote came one day after the governor signed an executive order prohibiting state agencies from spending funds on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.
Diversity, equity and inclusion efforts encourage employers to expand their hiring pools to include qualified applicants from historically marginalized groups. Opponents nationwide claim they grant preferential treatment to unqualified minority applicants.
Although the governor’s executive order generally prohibits diversity, equity and inclusion, it contains a broad exception for policies “authorized by state and federal law.” As a result, it isn’t immediately clear what existing practices are affected since many are authorized by law.
Like the executive order, House Bill 742 on one hand says state agencies can’t spend on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, but on the other says those agencies must continue to abide by federal and state employment and antidiscrimination laws. The bill now advances to the Senate for further debate.
Lawmakers endorse state takeover of St. Louis police After about a dozen years under local control, the state would again assume authority over the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department – but still require city taxpayers to pay the bills despite not having a say over how the department operates – under legislation the Missouri House of Representatives advanced to the Senate on Feb. 20 by a vote of 100-47, with six lawmakers voting “present.”
The state’s first takeover of the St. Louis police occurred at the outset of the Civil War as Missouri’s secessionist governor sought to limit the power of pro-Union city officials and suppress the city’s Black population. Although the Civil War ended, state control remained until 63.9% of Missouri voters approved a statewide ballot measure in November 2012 that put local officials in charge of the department.
Supporters of state control say it would stem violent crime. Opponents of the bill noted violent crime has increased throughout Missouri after the majority repeatedly weakened the state’s gun laws over the last decade-plus.
House Bill 495 also contains numerous other provisions relating to public safety, include several criminalizing protests and civil disobedience in possible violation of the First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly.
One particularly broad provision would make it a felony crime of “rioting” for a group of seven or more people to assemble and violate “any of the criminal laws of this state or the United States.” One state representative noted during debate that seven or more teenagers who gathered in a field to drink beer would be guilty of felony rioting under that wording.
Circuit judge authorizes resumption of abortions in state A Jackson County Circuit Court judge on Feb. 14 cleared abortions to resume in Missouri, ruling that an onerous licensing requirement targeting abortion providers runs afoul of the reproductive rights provisions voters added to the state constitution in November.
After the new constitutional protections, ratified as Amendment 3, took effect Dec. 5, reproductive rights supporters immediately filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of myriad abortion restrictions enacted into state law over the decades, including a near total ban on abortions that had been in effect since June 2022.
The circuit judge issued an injunction blocking enforcement of the statutory ban and numerous other restrictions on Dec. 20, finding them in violation of Amendment 3. However, she initially left in place one law that requires abortion facilities – but not other outpatient providers – to be licensed as ambulatory surgical centers. That costly requirement led to the closure of all but one Missouri abortion clinic years before the state enacted its total ban.
As result, abortions remained on hold in Missouri. In a follow up order issued Feb. 14, the judge reconsidered her previous decision and blocked enforcement of the licensing requirement, finding it “facially discriminatory because it does not treat services provided in abortion facilities the same as other types of similarly situated health care, including miscarriage care.”
The Missouri attorney general is expected to appeal the ruling to the Missouri Supreme Court. The case is Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains v. State of Missouri.
House votes to shield Bayer from Roundup lawsuits The House of Representatives voted 85-72 on Feb. 21 in favor of legislation designed to shield Bayer, a German corporation whose U.S. headquarters is located in Creve Coeur, from lawsuits over the company’s Roundup weedkiller.
More than 25,000 lawsuits have been filed in the Cole County Circuit Court alleging the product’s main chemical – glyphosate – causes cancer. In recent years, Bayer has paid at least $10 billion in jury awards and settlements nationwide in Roundup cases, according to the Missouri Independent.
Supporters of House Bill 544 said it would protect the use of any herbicide that is essential to agricultural production and has been widely applied for decades. Opponents said it would block Missourians harmed by the product from pursuing their claims in court.
On the same day, the House also passed separate legislation, House Bill 68, that would reduce the deadline for filing a personal injury lawsuit from the current five years to just two years, while doubling the deadline for filing cases alleging childhood sexual abuse from 10 years to 20 years. The bill passed on a vote of 92-42, with 24 lawmakers voting “present.” Both HB 544 and HB 68 now advance to the Senate.
|
CONTACT INFORMATION |
Thank you for your interest in the legislative process. I look forward to hearing from you on the issues that are important to you this legislative session. If there is anything my office can do for you, please do not hesitate to contact my office at 573-751-3599. |